Legal Opinion

Oliver v. Orrick

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 7, 1926PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNipper, J.

— The plaintiff in this case is an operator of carnivals in and about the city of St. Louis, and the defendants are members of the Board of Police Commissioners of the city of St. Louis. The defendants were fined for contempt of court, and bring the- ease here on appeal. A history of the litigation out of which the contempt case arose, and the proceedings leading up to the finding of the defendants guilty of contempt, may be stated as follows:

The plaintiff brought an injunction suit, in which he alleged that he had leased various lots of ground in the city of St. Louis, for the purpose of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex parte CreasySupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  2. Merchants' Stock & Grain Co. v. Board of Trade of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
  3. State ex rel. Kenamore v. WoodSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
  4. State ex rel. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. BlandSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
  5. In re HowellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Teefey v. TeefeySupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Middleton v. TozerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. Mary G v. SouderMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  4. In Re WillisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  5. Russo v. MillerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API