Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Bland

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 1, 1905PublishedCited by 39 opinions

Prohibition. (1) The power to pnnish for contempt is inherent in all superior courts of record. State ex inf. v. Shepherd, 177 Mo. 205 ; State ex rel. v. Ryan, 182 Mo. 349; In re Debs, 158 U. S. 594; Bessette v. W. B. Conkey Co., 194 U. S. 326; Anderson v. Dunn, 6 Wheat. 226; Ex parte Kearney, 7 Wheat. 39; Hayes v. Fischer, 102 U. S. 122; Ex parte Chetwood, 165 U. S. 443; Interstate Commerce Commission v. Brinson, 154 U. S. 489; Cooper v. People (Colo.), 6 L. R. A. 430;…

Read the full summary

Prohibition. (1) The power to pnnish for contempt is inherent in all superior courts of record. State ex inf. v. Shepherd, 177 Mo. 205 ; State ex rel. v. Ryan, 182 Mo. 349; In re Debs, 158 U. S. 594; Bessette v. W. B. Conkey Co., 194 U. S. 326; Anderson v. Dunn, 6 Wheat. 226; Ex parte Kearney, 7 Wheat. 39; Hayes v. Fischer, 102 U. S. 122; Ex parte Chetwood, 165 U. S. 443; Interstate Commerce Commission v. Brinson, 154 U. S. 489; Cooper v. People (Colo.), 6 L. R. A. 430; Smith v. Speed (Olda.), 55 L. R. A. 402; Cossart v. State, 14 Ark. 538; Bean v. State, 22 Ark. 149; Railroad v. Williams…

1Opinion of the CourtLamm, J.

In 1903 the Burlington company-commenced two proceedings in equity in the circuit court of St. Louis, one against Schubach and one against Gildersleeve, and the Alton company also commenced in said court its proceedings in equity against Gilder-sleeve — the life of each bill being for injunctive relief restraining said Schubach and Gildersleeve from dealing in the returri-trip part of a certain class of railroad tickets issued severally by relators to accommodate travel to and from the Louisiana Purchase Exposition at St. Louis, and sold at reduced price in considera*202tion of being…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Bessette v. W. B. Conkey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. In re NevittCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  3. In Re Watts and SachsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. People, Ex Rel. v. . Court of Oyer and TermNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  5. State ex inf. Crow v. ShepherdSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Teefey v. TeefeySupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Osborne v. PurdomeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  3. Curtis v. TozerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  4. Blodgett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Jafarian-Kerman v. Jafarian-KermanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API