Legal Opinion
Eagle Comtronics, Inc. v. Northeast Filter Co.
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided March 12, 1993No. 90-CV-573PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
McCURN, Chief Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff, Eagle Comtronics (“Eagle”), commenced this suit in May 1990, seeking damages from Northeast Filter Co., Inc. (“Northeast”) and Timothy M. Holdsworth (“Holds-worth”) resulting from their alleged infringement of Eagle’s ’803 patent. On November 21, 1991, this court issued a memorandum-decision and order (“November 21st Order”) that granted plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment as to all of defendants’ affirmative defenses and counterclaims based upon patent invalidity, laches, and equitable estoppel. See Eagle…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Avia Group International, Inc., (Formerly Pensa, Inc.) v. L.A. Gear California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Autogiro Company of America v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Young Dental Mfg. Co. v. Q3 Special Products, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1995