Legal Opinion

The Boeing Company v. The United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided February 24, 1989No. Appeal 88-1298PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISSELL, Circuit Judge.

The Boeing Company (Boeing) appeals the decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (Board), Boeing Co.— Boeing Military Airplane Div., ASBCA No. 29793, 88-1 BCA ¶ 20,380 (1987) [available on WESTLAW, 1987 WL 46116], holding that all of Boeing’s bid and proposal (B & P) costs incurred to enhance its ability to receive a Phase 2 contract must be recorded as direct costs of the Phase 1 contract, Contract No. F33657-77-C-0175, under the consistency requirements of General Accounting Office Cost Accounting Standard (CAS) 402, 4 C.F.R. §§ 402.10-.80 (1988).…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Singer-General Precision, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Aydin Corporation (West) v. Sheila E. Widnall, Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  2. United States Ex Rel. Mayman v. Martin Marietta Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1995
  3. United States v. Newport News Shipbuilding, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003
  4. Greenbush School Committee v. Mr. and Mrs. KDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1996
  5. ATK Thiokol, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API