Legal Opinion
HPM Development Corporation v. Watson-Stillman Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 15, 1947No. Civil Action 7301PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FORMAN, District Judge.
The H-P-M Development Corporation is the successor to the Hydraulic Press Corporation, Inc., which latter company together with the Hydraulic Press Manufacturing Company entered into a contract with the Watson-Stillman Company on September 11, 1937. The successor company and the Hydraulic Press Company are plaintiffs in this action and they allege, among other things that they own nineteen patents for inventions and designs on systems, apparatus for, and methods of operation of hydraulic presses of the self-contained, high speed and pressure type including all types of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Sola Electric Co. v. Jefferson Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Automatic Radio Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Hazeltine Research, IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Automatic Radio Manufacturing Co. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Automatic Radio Mfg. Co. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1949
- United States v. General Electric Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1949
- Hazeltine Research, Inc. v. Automatic Radio Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1948
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.