Legal Opinion

Philomath Forest Products Co. v. Employment Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 18, 1987No. 86-AB-869-A, 86-AB-869; CA A41934Published

1Per curiam

Although respondent Smith prevailed at all levels in this case, costs may not be awarded against the Employment Division, because the Division did not take a position that was adverse to him. Hoard v. Employment Division, 82 Or App 718, 729 P2d 593 (1986). Neither may costs be awarded against petitioner, a private party. Shetterly, Irick & Shetterly v. Emp. Div., 302 Or 139, 727 P2d 117 (1986).

Motion for costs denied.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shetterly, Irick & Shetterly v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Hoard v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986