Legal Opinion
Connecticut General Life Insurance v. Punia
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 27, 1995No. Civ. 93-593 (WHW)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLS, District Judge.
The defendants, Herbert Punia, Leonard Punia and Bernard Weissman (collectively, “the guarantors”) move for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Argument was heard on April 10, 1995. For reasons stated below, the motion is granted, dismissing plaintiff Connecticut General Life Insurance Company’s (“CGLIC”) complaint.
Background
The plaintiff, Connecticut General Life Insurance Company, brought this lawsuit to enforce the terms of a $3 million personal guaranty given by the guarantors to secure an $11 million loan given to the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sound Ship Building Corp v. Bethlehem Steel Company (Incorporated)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Karl's Sales & Serv., Inc. v. Gimbel Bros., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- Dunkin' Donuts of America, Inc. v. Middletown Donut Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re DenaroUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2008
- In Re KaragiannisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2011