Henschel v. Mamero
Illinois Supreme Court
Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District;— heard in that court on appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. H. M. Shepabd, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mulkey
Franz Mamero and wife, by deed bearing date February 28, 1874, conveyed to their son-in-law, William Henschel, a house and lot on Sedgwick street, Chicago, being the premises now in controversy. The consideration, as expressed in the deed, was $3000, though nothing in fact was paid. The day before the deed was recorded, to-wit, on the 2d of March, 1874, Henschel executed to Mamero his two promissory notes, one for $1000, and the other for $2000, and both payable three years after date, with interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum. These notes were secured by separate trust deeds on the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Champney v. . CoopeNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- Frazier v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1854
- Hale v. MorganIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
- Goulding v. BunsterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
3Cited by6 opinions
- Parrish v. ParrishOregon Supreme Court · 1898
- White v. CannonIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
- Houghteling v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1939
- First Trust Joint Stock Land Bank v. HickokAppellate Court of Illinois · 1936
- Wilke v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.