Colvin v. Sheets
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUHRHEINRICH, Circuit Judge.
The Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments bars retrial following a declaration of mistrial unless the defendant consented to the mistrial or there was a “manifest necessity” for the mistrial. In this habeas appeal brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Respondent Michael Sheets challenges the district court’s conclusion that the state court unreasonably applied Supreme Court precedent when it determined that the state trial court’s declaration of a mistrial was manifestly necessary and therefore not a violation of Colvin’s Fifth Amendment…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Leonard Pierson, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2013
- United States v. Derek CapozziCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Colvin v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- In re Petition for Habeas Corpus by BowmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
- In re Petition for Habeas Corpus by BowmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.