Legal Opinion · Dissent

Claremont School District v. Governor

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 11, 2002No. 97-001Published

1Dissent

Nadeau, J., and Dalianis, J.,

dissenting. We believe that existing statutes, regulations and rules provide for sufficient accountability to withstand a facial constitutional challenge.

*522It seems obvious to us that accountability is presumptively a part of any governmental obligation, including the State’s obligation to provide a constitutionally adequate education, and is necessarily provided by the adjudicative, legislative, and elective processes. If individuals believe their constitutional or statutory rights have been violated, they may seek redress from the adjudicative process. Surely it…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Claremont School District v. GovernorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  2. Claremont School District v. GovernorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  3. State v. MorrillSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  4. Appeal of Public Service Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  5. Fish v. Homestead Woolen Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API