Legal Opinion

In Re Parent

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided July 30, 1965No. 1938PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The petition for habeas corpus in this case alleges that the commitment is invalid because the petitioner was improperly sentenced. He claims, and the State concedes, that the court ordering his confinement set a maximum term but, contrary to the provisions of 13 V.S.A.§7031, set no minimum term. In fact, the trial court set an identical maximum and minimum term, which is acknowledged to be contrary to the spirit and intent of the statute, and is error.

This error does not require the discharge of the petitioner. The propriety of the conviction is not challenged. The error is in the sentence,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re HarrisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1896

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Duffy v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Woodmansee v. StonemanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1975
  3. State v. LambertSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  4. State v. BushwaySupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
  5. State v. BruleySupreme Court of Vermont · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API