Legal Opinion

State v. Mohi

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1995No. 940028, 940200 and 940201Published

1Opinion of the Court

901 P.2d 991 (1995)

STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

Asipeli MOHI, Defendant and Appellant.

STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

Phillip Daniel LUNDQUIST, Defendant and Appellant.

STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

Daniel Rodrigo CHAIDES, Defendant and Appellant.

Nos. 940028, 940200 and 940201.

Supreme Court of Utah.

June 15, 1995.

Rehearing Denied September 14, 1995.

Jan Graham, Atty. Gen., Carol Clawson, Julie George, J. Kevin Murphy, Asst. Attys. Gen., Salt Lake City, for plaintiff.

Ronald J. Yengich, Hakeem Ishola, Salt Lake City, for Mohi.

Linda Anderson, Provo, for Lundquist.

Thomas…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Russon; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Howe.

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API