Legal Opinion

Trancynger v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 5, 2017No. 16 Civ. 2153 (GWG)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff Darren Trancynger brings this action to review the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, finding that Trancynger was not disabled and thus not eligible for disability insurance1 benefits. Trancynger seeks to have the case remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings. See Motion to Remand and/or for Judgment on the Pleadings, filed Sept. 21, 2016 (Docket #22) (“PI. Mem,”). The Commissioner moves for judgment on the pleadings to affirm the Commissioner’s decision.1 For the following reasons,…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Ysabel Rosa v. John S. Callahan, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  4. Brault v. Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  5. Sims v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Conetta v. BerryhillDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
  2. Distefano v. BerryhillDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
  3. Martes v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  4. Cardoza v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
  5. Brown v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API