Legal Opinion

Official Committee of Asbestos of G-I Holding, Inc. v. Heyman

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 19, 2004No. 01 Civ. 8539(RWS)PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Defendant Samuel Heyman (“Heyman”) has moved pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1412, or in the alternative, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), to transfer this action to the District of New Jersey. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is denied.

Parties

Plaintiff, the Official Committee of Asbestos Claimants of G-I Holdings, Inc. (the “Committee”), is a creditors committee appointed by the United States Trustee pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 1102(a). The Committee is made up of persons who assert claims against G-I, as successor to GAF Corporation (“GAF”), by reason of personal…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. In Re Manville Forest Products Corporation, Debtor. Gulf States Exploration Co. v. Manville Forest Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  4. DiRienzo v. Philip Services Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  5. Official Committee of Asbestos of G-I Holding, Inc. v. HeymanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Enron Corp. v. Arora (In Re Enron Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2004
  2. ICICI Bank Ltd. v. Essar Global Fund Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  3. Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  4. Rescap Liquidating Trust v. PHH Mortgage Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  5. Tallo v. GianopoulosDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API