Legal Opinion

State v. Nickerson

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 19, 1990No. 2 CA-CR 89-0472PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION .

HATHAWAY, Judge.

Appellant pled guilty to one count of theft of property having a value of more than $100 but less than $250, a class 6 open-ended offense, and was placed on three years’ probation. After petitioner admitted to violating two of the conditions of his probation, he was continued on probation with additional conditions, including that he not have any personal contact with his wife, his codefendant, without the prior written consent of his probation officer. Appellant timely appealed from the disposition order. For the reasons stated below, we affirm.

Appellant contends…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. MontgomeryArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. DonovanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  3. State v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  4. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  5. State v. MearsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. WarrenWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. WarrenWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API