Legal Opinion

State v. Bell

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1995No. Cr. 950049PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEUMANN, Justice.

Kyle Bell appeals from sentences imposed upon his pleas of guilty to two counts of gross sexual imposition and two counts of using a minor in a sexual performance. We affirm.

The charges stem from incidents of sexual contact between Bell, his eight-year-old daughter and his neighbor’s three-year-old daughter. There was testimony that at the encounters Bell caused the girls to undress and also undressed them himself. During some encounters Bell was clothed, while during others he was not. There also was evidence indicating Bell tried to enter the home of two other young girls…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. CummingsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. EnnisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. HassNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Houle v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. ZenoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. SteinbachNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. MagnusonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. GonzalezNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Bell v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. McCleanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API