Legal Opinion

Colby v. Imbrie & Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1926PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

The respondents here have attempted to redeem the stockholdings of the petitioner, Bainbridge Colby, and thereby to frustrate his efforts to secure an examination of the books and records of the respondent corporation. The attempt is clearly abortive. According to the plain and unmistakable language of the certificate of incorporation, the company’s option to redeem does not spring into being until April 1, 1926. It can only be exercised by a majority vote of the founders stock “ at the time ” outstanding, and then only upon not less than thirty days’ notice, to the stockholders whose shares…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of SteinwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. In re Fechheimer Fisher Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
  3. People ex rel. Ludwig v. Ludwig & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  4. In re TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  5. People v. American Press Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. Miller-Wohl Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1942
  2. Colby v. Imbrie & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API