Legal Opinion
Cinetel Films, Inc. v. Does 1-1,052
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided April 4, 2012No. Civil No. JFM 8:11-cv-02438PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
J. FREDERICK MOTZ, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, CineTel Films, Inc. (“Cine-Tel”) and Family of the Year Productions, LLC (“Family”), (collectively, “plaintiffs”), filed a complaint in this court on August 11, 2011 against unidentified John Doe defendants 1-1,052,1 seeking monetary and *547injunctive relief for copyright infringement pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 101 et seq. Pending before the court are (1) Motions to Sever filed by Does 128, 465, 514 (ECF Nos. 13, 42, 46); (2) Motions to Quash or Modify Plaintiffs’ Subpoena, filed by Does 91, 97, 122, 128, 155, 156, 173, 168, 177, 234, 290, 337,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Sony Music Entertainment Inc. v. Does 1-40District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation EnterprisesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Digital Sin, Inc. v. Does 1-176District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Third Degree Films v. Does 1-47District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
- Rhodes v. Litigation Trust of the Rhodes Companies (In re Rhodes Companies)District Court, D. Nevada · 2012
- Patrick Collins, Inc. v. Does 1-38District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
- Eichenwald v. RivelloDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2018
- Malibu Media, LLC v. John Does 1-28District Court, M.D. Florida · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.