Commonwealth v. Babbs
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge:
The principal issue in this appeal is whether a criminal defendant’s failure to appear for trial, without evidence of flight or concealment, is sufficient to permit a fact finder to infer a consciousness of guilt. The trial court, over defense objections, allowed evidence that appellant had failed to appear on a prior trial date and then instructed the jury that it could infer a consciousness of guilt from this evidence. We conclude that this was error. Therefore, we reverse and remand for a new trial.
At or about 1:00 p.m. on October 14, 1982, Jesse Johnson, an unlicensed taxi…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. CoyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Commonwealth v. HickmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. StoykoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. WhackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Sorrell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Decker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Commonwealth v. CarterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Commonwealth v. HollomanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Commonwealth v. BarnesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.