Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Babbs

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 18, 1985No. 710PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

The principal issue in this appeal is whether a criminal defendant’s failure to appear for trial, without evidence of flight or concealment, is sufficient to permit a fact finder to infer a consciousness of guilt. The trial court, over defense objections, allowed evidence that appellant had failed to appear on a prior trial date and then instructed the jury that it could infer a consciousness of guilt from this evidence. We conclude that this was error. Therefore, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

At or about 1:00 p.m. on October 14, 1982, Jesse Johnson, an unlicensed taxi…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. CoyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Commonwealth v. HickmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Commonwealth v. StoykoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. WhackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Sorrell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  2. Decker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  3. Commonwealth v. CarterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Commonwealth v. HollomanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Commonwealth v. BarnesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API