Legal Opinion

McStay v. Friedman

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 18, 1876PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Motion to dismiss a writ of error to the Supreme Court of the State of California.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Waite

This was an action of ejectment brought by Friedman to recover the possession of a certain parcel of the Pueblo lands confirmed to the city of San Francisco by the act of Congress passed March 8, 1866 (14 Stat. 4). He did not attempt to connect himself with the city title, but relied entirely upon his alleged prior possession and that of his grantors.

The defendants, who are the plaintiffs in error, set up in their answer, as defences, (1) adverse possession, with specifi cations to bring themselves within the operation of the Statute of Limitations; and (2) the title of the city of San…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Romie v. CasanovaSupreme Court of the United States · 1876

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Blackburn v. Portland Gold Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. McCune v. EssigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1903
  3. Trafton v. NouguesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of California · 1877
  4. Blue Bird Min. Co. v. LargeyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Montana · 1892
  5. California Ex Rel. Hastings v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API