In re Wallace
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Order reversed and decree directed revoking the letters of administration issued to the respondent, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant, payable out of the estate.—Appeal from an order of the Surrogate's Court of Erie county, made December 3, 1901, dismissing a petition for the revocation of letters of administration.—
1Opinion of the Court
Williams, J.:
The order appealed from should be reversed and a decree directed revoking the letters of administration issued, to James Gorman, respondent, with ten dollars costs and disbursements of this appeal to appellant, payable from the estate. The respondent is an unfit and improper person to remain administrator. He has acted improperly, and, moreover, he claimed that substantially the whole estate belonged to himself and that the deceased had no .property when she died, although there was standing in her name in three savings banks in Buffalo nearly $6,000. If he has succeeded in…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Cameron v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- In Re Estate of WatkinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1944
- Farnsworth v. HatchUtah Supreme Court · 1915
- Corey v. CoreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Dudley v. JonesMontana Supreme Court · 1957
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.