Legal Opinion
State v. Brown
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 29, 1992No. 17319Published
1Opinion of the Court
480 N.W.2d 761 (1992)
STATE of South Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee,
v.
James Rankin BROWN, Defendant and Appellant.
No. 17319.
Supreme Court of South Dakota.
Considered on Briefs September 12, 1991.
Decided January 29, 1992.
Mark Barnett, Atty. Gen., Sherri Sundem Wald, Asst. Atty. Gen., Pierre, for plaintiff and appellee.
Daniel W. Graves of Olinger, Srstka, Lovald, Robbennolt & McCahren, Pierre, for defendant and appellant.
WUEST, Justice.
James Rankin Brown (Brown) appeals his conviction for one count of perjury under SDCL 22-29-1[1]. We affirm.
FACTS
Brown's conviction stems from sworn testimony…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- In re Japanese Electronic Products Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Anthony Damian AzureCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- Paul Randolph Liner, Cross v. J. B. Talley and Company, Inc., Cross North River Insurance Company and International Surplus Lines Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- State v. GroshSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.