Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Atkinson

District Court, E.D. South Carolina

Decided June 7, 1949No. Crim. Nos. 17388, 17410PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

84 F.Supp. 300 (1949)

Ex parte ATKINSON.

UNITED STATES

v.

ATKINSON.

Crim. Nos. 17388, 17410.

United States District Court E. D. South Carolina, Alken Division.

June 7, 1949.

W. Croft Jennings, Columbia, S. C., for petitioner.

Ben Scott Whaley, United State Attorney, Charleston, S. C., Louis M. Shimel, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, S.C., for United States of America.

WYCHE, Chief Judge.

The petitioner petitions the Court to vacate the judgment and sentence in the above cases under the provisions of Section 2255, 28 U.S.C.A., upon the ground, among others, that he was not guilty of the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bowen v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Sunal v. LargeSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Sunal v. LargeSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. United States v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1818
  5. Ex Parte HudgingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. United States v. BucurCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
  3. R. B. Boone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
  4. United States v. Richard Hugh McGeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
  5. United States v. KranzDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1949

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API