Legal Opinion

Stewart v. . Craven

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 22, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarksoN, J.

Upon petition of defendant in due form, tbe court below issued a writ of recordari, as a substitute for an appeal, to tbe justice of tbe peace wbo tried tbe action. No exception was entered to tbe granting of tbis writ. The order appealed from to this Court is as follows:

“Tbis cause coming on to be beard on tbis 18 April, 1933, in chambers before bis Honor, Judge E. H. Cramner, one of tbe judges bolding court for tbe Seventh Judicial District of North Carolina at Raleigh, North Carolina, and being beard upon motion filed by plaintiff for tbe purpose of setting aside a writ of recordari…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barnes v. . EastonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  2. Bargain House v. . JeffersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  3. Hunter v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  4. Perry v. . WhitakerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  5. Merrell v. . McHoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Freeman v. BennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  2. Utilities Com. v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. State ex rel. North Carolina Utilities Commission v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API