St. Louis & Southwestern Railway Co. v. Nattin
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds
This cause was heard by a specially constituted District Court — three judges. Jud. Code, Secs. 283, 266. It dismissed the bill and directed that the costs, together with ten per cent, damages, be assessed against appellant. The opinion of the court, considered with the argument here, so plainly demonstrates the lack of merit in the claims advanced that we need not discuss them at length.
The appellant owns a line of railroad lying partly in Bossier Parish, Louisiana, also- all stock of the corporate owner of the bridge over Red River at Bossier City. Purporting to proceed as directed by the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Valley Farms Co. of Yonkers v. County of WestchesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Hancock v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
3Cited by42 opinions
- Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Commonwealth Edison Co. v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Nashville, C. & St. LR Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. WaltersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.