Commonwealth v. Brady
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcHugh, J.
After the defendants, Paul Brady and Marilyn Coussoule, waived their rights to a trial by jury on complaints charging them with larceny of property having a value in excess of $250, see G. L. c. 266, § 30, witnesses were sworn and the trial began. The charges arose out of the defendants’ alleged removal of an ornate door from a showroom and warehouse they had occupied. Doormakers by trade, the defendants had *785installed the door when they first occupied the premises. The Commonwealth claimed that they had removed it upon their eviction, replacing it with an ill-fitting door of far less…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Commonwealth v. LatimoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Commonwealth v. DuquetteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
- Commonwealth v. FernandesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Kater v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rhodes v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
- Commonwealth v. CastilloMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
- Commonwealth v. MonteiroMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
- Commonwealth v. McKenzieMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018