Commonwealth v. McKenzie
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
Before us are the consolidated appeals from orders denying the defendant's postconviction motions concerning his two convictions, after a bench trial, as a level three armed career criminal under G. L. c. 269, § 10G (c ) (ACC).2 Because only two of the three predicate offenses upon which those convictions rested were sequential, see Commonwealth v. Resende, 474 Mass. 455 (2016), we agree with the defendant that the findings that the defendant was guilty as a level three armed career criminal and the consolidated sentence based on the three predicate offenses must be vacated and that the case…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. RandolphMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
- Commonwealth v. McGovernMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Commonwealth v. ResendeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
- Commonwealth v. StevensMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Commonwealth v. CastilloMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.