TRACY LYNNE GIMLEN, Petitioner-Respondent v. RUBEN D. RIVERO

Ruben D. Rivero (“Respondent”) appeals from the trial court’s grant of a full order of protection against him in favor of Tracy Lynne Gimlen (“Petitioner”). In a single point, Respondent claims that the trial court erred because there was not “substantial evidence” to support a finding that Petitioner was subjectively alarmed by Respondent’s conduct or that a reasonable person in the same situation would be alarmed by Respondent’s conduct. We disagree and affirm. 1

Standard of Review

In a court-tried case, we will affirm:

the trial court’s judgment as long as it is supported by substantial…