Legal Opinion

Wolverine Farms Co. v. De Young

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1914No. Docket No. 134PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Montcalm; Davis, J. Assumpsit by John G. Emery and John L. Bailey, copartners as the Wolverine Farms Company, against Cornelius De Young for broker’s commissions. Judgment for defendant on a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

The plaintiffs, John G. Emery and John L. Bailey, copartners, doing a real estate business, at Grand Rapids, under the name of Wolverine Farms Company, brought this suit to recover from the defendant a commission of $200.

The declaration contains a special count and also the common counts in assumpsit. The plaintiffs claim to have acted as hiiddlemen in bringing together the *201defendant and one Stewart M. Rose, and that, by reason of the services of plaintiffs, the defendant and Rose came to an agreement and entered into a written contract in and by which said Rose agreed to trade a farm to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. St. Mary's Power Co. v. Chandler-Dunbar Water-Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Peterson v. MahonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Burton v. LaddMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Superior Steel Spring Co. v. New Era Spring & Specialty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API