Legal Opinion · Dissent

Koppel v. Hebrew Academy of Five Towns

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 1, 1993Published

1DissentLawrence, J.

I respectfully disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the defendants are entitled to summary judgment dismissing the complaint, on the ground that it was not foreseeable that a child would attempt to climb its fence.

On October 23, 1983, the infant plaintiff Kara Koppel, then 14 years old, was injured while attempting to help a young boy off the defendants’ fence, which surrounded the defendant’s schoolyard and playground and was adjacent to the public sidewalk. The boy had started to climb the fence to retrieve a ball in the defendants’ playground, and allegedly became endangered by…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Derdiarian v. Felix Contracting Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Basso v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Scurti v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Collentine v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  5. Diven v. Village of Hastings-On-HudsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API