Legal Opinion

The Suduffco

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 30, 1929PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THACHER, District Judge.

Upon the proofs presented at the trial the petitioners clearly showed seaworthiness at the commencement of the voyage, and accordingly tihat they were prima facie entitled to limit their liability to the value of the vessel and her pending freights. Claimants’ witnesses who testified in court impressed me as unreliable, and upon the whole case I have no hesitation in finding that the vessel was in fact seaworthy. But if it had been shown that the vessel was in some respects unseaworthy, and that the fact was ascertainable in the exercise of reasonable diligence, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. The Malcolm Baxter, Jr.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. The 84-HCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
  3. Merchants' Banking Co. v. Cargo of the AftonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1904
  4. The Linseed KingDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1928
  5. The John H. StarinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. The DenaliCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  2. The YungayDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
  3. Northern Fishing & Trading Co. v. GrabowskiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  4. Brooks v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1944
  5. Northern Fishing & Trading Company, Inc. v. GrabowskiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API