Legal Opinion

Bashar v. Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1913PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Ohio County. Action by. William Bashar against the Pittsburg, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Robinson, Judge:

The demurrer to the declaration was properly overruled. The pleading is not subject to the criticism that it does not allege a promise to pay, and therefore is not good in assumpsit. It is a declaration on a contract to carry goods. The promise and undertaking safely to carry and deliver is plainly averred. The declaration as a whole has been copied from the form given in 4 Minor’s Institutes, 3d ed., pt. 2, page 1682. It is undoubtedly good. Plaintiff’s counsel seems to think it is not good because it does not allege a promise of payment. But it is not based on a case for the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wright v. Standard Ultramarine and Color Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Coal Run Coal Co. v. CecilWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Carter v. JonesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Carter v. JonesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. McKenzie v. MackallWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API