Legal Opinion

Burns Jackson v. Lindner

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1981PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Edwin Kassoff, J.

In these actions seeking damages resulting from a mass transit strike conducted by the defendant unions in April of 1980 against the New York City Transit Authority (the *459Transit Authority) and the Manhattan and Bronx Surface Operating Authority (MABSTOA), the defendants move pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 7) to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action.

Plaintiffs commenced an action in this court as a class action at about the same time they commenced another action in New York County. Subsequently, by an order dated August 6,…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Rovello v. Orofino Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Lawrence v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  4. H. R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Burns Jackson Miller Summit & Spitzer v. LindnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Burns Jackson Miller Summit & Spitzer v. LindnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. G-I Holdings, Inc. v. Baron & BuddDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  4. Fulenwider v. Firefighters Ass'n Local Union 1784Tennessee Supreme Court · 1982
  5. R.M. Perlman Inc. v. New York Coat, Suit, Dresses, Rainwear & Allied Workers' Union Local 89-22-1District Court, S.D. New York · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API