Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. City of Renton v. Commercial Waterway District No. 2

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1929No. 21703. Department TwoPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

Renton, a city of the third class, by ordinances of June and November, 1924, organized within its corporate limits two local improvement districts for the purpose of paving streets and constructing sidewalks. The city council duly approved and confirmed by ordinance the assessment rolls, and assessments were levied on the real property within the improvement districts. Commercial Waterway District No. 2, a quasi-municipal corporation, organized under the commercial waterways statute (Rem. Comp. Stat. §§9724-9776), refused to pay the special assessments levied against it, and disallowed the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Edwards & Walsh Construction Co. v. Jasper CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  2. Rucker Bros. v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Seattle School District No 1 v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Grandin v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Sanderson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Saratoga v. HuffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Church Home & Infirmary v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
  3. Tiffany Family Trust Corp. v. City of KentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  4. Tiffany Family Trust Corp. v. City of KentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API