Legal Opinion

Grandin v. City of Tacoma

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1915No. 12203PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Chapman, J., entered April 2, 1914, upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, dismissing an action to enjoin the collection of a special assessment.

1Per curiam

This action was begun to restrain the city of Tacoma from collecting, or attempting to collect, a special assessment levied upon appellants’ property in Grandin addition. The city demurred to the complaint on the ground that the court had no jurisdiction of the subject-matter of the action and that the facts stated did not show a cause of action. The demurrer was sustained, and this appeal followed.

The assessment which appellants seek to have cancelled was levied in the manner prescribed by Laws of 1911, p. *99441, chapter 98 (8 Rem. & Bal. Code, § 7892-1), which it is conceded is applicable. The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Longfellow v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Longview v. Longview Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Sanderson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. State Ex Rel. City of Renton v. Commercial Waterway District No. 2Washington Supreme Court · 1929
  4. North American Lumber Co. v. City of BlaineWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Town of Brewster v. HamiltonWashington Supreme Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API