Legal Opinion

State v. Matt

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1968PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

This is an appeal from a conviction for the crime of larceny of an automobile. Defendant maintains the trial court erred in admitting the testimony of a police officer relative to attempted exculpatory but incriminating statements made by defendant concerning where he had secured the vehicle.

Defendant admits there was evidence that he was advised of his constitutional rights and that he told the police officer he was familiar with his rights and was willing to make a statement. He contends, however, that the evidence was insufficient to sustain a finding that he had waived his right to have…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. State v. WrightOregon Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. DavidsonOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. McGee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1969
  3. Bowling v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1970
  4. State v. PendergrassSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  5. Anderson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1969

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API