Legal Opinion
C. M. G. v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided May 1, 1979No. J-78-362PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRETT, Judge:
’The juvenile, the State, and this Court agree that the threshold determination is whether or not the Chilocco Indian School (Chiloceo) is “Indian country” within the definition of 18 U.S.C. § 1151 (1970).1 If the school is Indian country, the United States has exclusive jurisdiction over prosecution of the offense. If it is not Indian country, then the State of Oklahoma and the United States have concurrent jurisdiction to prosecute the crime charged, and this Court must deal with the allegations of error in the certification proceedings.
Title 18 U.S.C. § 1152 (1970),…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. MazurieSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Donnelly v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- DeCoteau v. District County Court for the Tenth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Ross v. NeffCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Ross v. NeffCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- State v. KlindtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1989
- Indian Country, U.S.A., Inc. v. Oklahoma ex rel. Oklahoma Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Murphy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.