Sa v. Director
New Jersey Tax Court
1Opinion of the Court
NARAYANAN, J.T.C.
This is the court’s opinion in connection with the parties’ respective motions for summary judgment in the above captioned matter. Plaintiff (“Mr. Sa”) asks this court to find that payments made by his employer, Union Township, for work-related injuries be excluded from gross income tax (“GIT”) as workmen’s compensation pursuant to N.J.S.A 54A:6-6. Defendant (“Director”) maintains that the exclusion does not apply because Union Township paid Mr. Sa his full amount of periodic wages pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement, and the statute requires that payments be made…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- Peper v. Princeton University Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
- Merin v. MaglakiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Kimmelman v. Henkels & McCoy, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- O'Gilvie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.