Markley v. Semle
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
LIPEZ, Justice.
[¶ 1] The plaintiffs, John and Mary Mark-ley, appeal from the judgment entered in the Superior Court (York County, Fritzsche J.) in favor of the defendants, Scott and Debra Semle. The Markleys contend, inter alia, that the court erred in concluding that they had failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence the location of the common boundary between their property and the Semles’ property. Finding no error, we affirm.
I
[¶2] The Markleys and the Semles own adjoining parcels of land in Hollis. The Markleys initiated this action pursuant to the Declaratory Judgments Act, 14…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Hodgdon v. CampbellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- Ollison v. Village of Climax SpringsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
- Chappell v. DonnellyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Mariello v. GiguereSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Adelson v. HananelCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Dowley v. MorencySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
- Ma v. BryanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
- Merrill v. Sugarloaf Mountain Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Tarbuck v. JaeckelSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.