Legal Opinion

Muskogee County v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 6, 1943No. 2587PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAH, Circuit Judge.

By Section 2 of the Act of June 20, 1936, 49 Slat. 1542, all lands the title to which were held by an Indian, subject to restrictions against alienation without the consent and approval of the Secretary of the Interior, and purchased out of trust or restricted funds of the said Indian, were declared to be instrumentalities of the Federal government and nontaxable until otherwise directed by Congress. By the amendatory Act of May 19, 1937, 50 Stat. 188, 25 U.S.C.A. § 412a, Congress limited the scope of the exemption granted by the *631936 Act to “homesteads” purchased out…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Board of Comm'rs of Jackson Cty. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. United States v. Nez Perce County, IdahoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  3. Sperry Oil & Gas Co. v. ChisholmSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, ETC. v. SeberCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  5. Board of Com'rs of Caddo County, Okl. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Thurston CountyDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1944
  2. George F. Hazelwood Company v. PitsenbargerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Board of County Com'rs of Marshall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
  4. Lewis v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  5. Bridges v. StickDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API