Hankins v. Williamsburg City Fire Insurance
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Douglas district court; Charles A. Smart, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, C. J.:
The decision herein turns upon the interpretation of a provision in a policy of fire insurance that: “This entire policy, unless otherwise provided by agreement indorsed hereon or added hereto, shall be void . . .' if the interest of the insured be other than unconditional and sole ownership.”
It appears that on July 15, 1909, plaintiff purchased, with, his individual funds, a business building in Baldwin and took the deed therefor in the name of his wife, Mary J. Hankins, which he has always kept in his possession. Plaintiff paid the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hough v. City Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1860
- Lebanon Mutual Insurance v. ErbSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
- Bonham v. Iowa Central InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
- McCoy v. Iowa State InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
3Cited by11 opinions
- Waller v. City of New York Ins.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Roberts v. American Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- King v. National Union Fire Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Palmetto Fire Insurance v. FanslerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925
- Lawson v. Southern Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.