Legal Opinion
Barry James Christensen, II v. Findlay ARN, LLC, et al.
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided December 31, 2025No. 3:24-cv-00371Unknown
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 * * * 4 BARRY JAMES CHRISTENSEN, II, Case No. 3:24-CV-00371-ART-CLB 5 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S 6 v. MOTION TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DENYING 7 FINDLAY ARN, LLC, et al., DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE 8 Defendants. [ECF Nos. 51, 53] 9 10 Before the Court is Plaintiff Barry James Christensen, II’s (“Christensen”) motion 11 for leave to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 511.) Also pending before the Court is 12 Defendant Findlay ARN, LLC, Findlay Automotive Inc., and Justin Findlay’s (collectively…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Dcd Programs, Ltd. v. Michael W. Leighton, Hill, Farrer & BurrillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Pennsylvania State Police v. SudersSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.