Legal Opinion

Farash v. Sykes Datatronics, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 12, 1983PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Chief Judge Cooke.

Plaintiff claims that he and defendant entered an agreement whereby defendant would lease a building owned by *503plaintiff, who was to complete its renovation and make certain modifications on an expedited basis. Defendant, however, never signed any contract and never occupied the building. Plaintiff commenced this litigation, and defendant unsuccessfully moved to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action. On appeal, the Appellate Division reversed, with two Justices dissenting in part. For the reasons that follow, we now modify.

Plaintiff pleaded three…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Miller v. . SchlossNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Bradkin v. LevertonNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Erben v. . LorillardNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  4. Baldwin v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1851

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Bauman Associates, Inc. v. H & M International Transport, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Bausch & Lomb Inc. v. BresslerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  4. Gary Joseph Grappo v. Alitalia Linee Aeree Italiane, S.P.A. And Gianfranco BianchiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  5. Schoenduve Corporation, a California Corporation v. Lucent Technologies, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API