Six Twenty-Nine Productions, Inc. v. Rollins Telecasting, Inc., D/B/A Station Wear-Tv, Channel 3, Pensacola, Florida

HUGHES, District Judge.

This case presents the question of whether a television station’s refusal to accept filmed commercials submitted by an advertising agency on behalf of its clients, payment for which would be made by the station on a commission basis, constitutes a violation of the federal antitrust laws.

Appellant, Six Twenty-Nine Productions, Inc., hereinafter called plaintiff, in a suit against appellee, Rollins Telecasting, Inc., d/b/a WEAR-TY, Pensacola, Florida, hereinafter called defendant, alleged a violation of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act, 1 and prayed for an injunction…