Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Williams v. Shaughnessy

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 11, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFRitz, J.

The petitioner was entitled to' relief in the municipal court, only if he had a right to have portions of the grand jury report expunged from the court files. The right which he thus sought to protect was a substantial right. The remedy to which he resorted to protect that right was a special proceeding as defined in secs. 260.02 to 260.04, Stats. The final order of the court denying the relief which the petitioner sought was “a final order affecting a substantial right made in a special proceeding.” Consequently, the order was appealable (sec. 274.33 (2), Stats.), and an appeal to this court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Fourth National Bank of Philadelphia v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  2. State ex rel. City of Milwaukee v. LudwigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  3. State ex rel. Wisconsin Power & Light Co. v. ZimmermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  4. State ex rel. Cooper v. BrazeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Village of Bangor v. Hussa Canning & Pickle Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API