Legal Opinion

Fulton, Supt. of Banks v. Kabaker

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 10, 1934No. 14063PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By LIEGHLEY, J.

It was tmdisputed in argument that plaintiff filed a claim as general creditor with the liquidator, which claim was allowed, and he was thereafter paid the dividends of twenty-one (21%) percent declared upon general creditor accounts. It also appeared in argument that plaintiff filed a claim for preference with the liquidator, which was rejected, and it seems that this action was predicated upon the rejection of this claim. That plaintiff seeks a preference is evidenced by the language of his petition in complaining that a demand for the full sum was refused, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Davis v. Elmira Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. In re BologhDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1911

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re Estate of BinderCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API