In re Bologh
District Court, S.D. New York
In the matters of bankruptcy of Philip Bologh and others, of Frederick Rosenzweig, individually and trading as Art Novelty Company, and of Simon Lindau. Motions by receiver in bankruptcy in the Rosenzweig-and Lindau cases and by the trustee in bankruptcy in the Bologh case for an order directing the New York Superintendent of Banks to pay to the respective petitioners moneys deposited by them in the Carnegie Trust Company.
1Opinion of the Court
HOLT, District Judge.
These are three similar motions, made by a receiver in bankruptcy in each of the Rosenzweig and Lindau cases, and by a trustee in bankruptcy in the Bologh case, for orders directing the superintendent of banks of the state of New York to pay to the respective petitioners certain amounts deposited by them with the Carnegie Trust Company. In 1907 this court designated the Carnegie Trust Company as a depositary for the money of bankrupt estates, pursuant to section 61 of the bankrupt act (Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 562 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3446]). The Carnegie…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Davis v. Elmira Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Elmira Savings Bank v. DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re PotellDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1931
- Lamb v. TownshendCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
- Bridge v. First Nat. Bank-DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1933
- Clifton City Bank v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1927
- In re WassermanNew York Supreme Court · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.