Legal Opinion

Dawkins v. National Liberty Life Insurance

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided January 17, 1967No. Civ. A. No. 66-586PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEMPHILL, District Judge.

The defendant insurance company moves to strike from the complaint all references to punitive damages and the demand for punitive damages. The company relies on the principle of South Carolina law that no punitive damages are recoverable for a mere failure or refusal to pay a debt or a sum of money.1 Defendant also moves for a dismissal of the case, referring to a previous case between the parties which was dismissed, on the grounds that it is determinable to a legal certainty that the jurisdictional amount required for diversity jurisdiction in the District Court is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Holland v. Spartanburg Herald-Journal Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  2. Castell v. Stephenson Finance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  3. Bradley v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  4. Dawkins v. NATIONAL LIBERTY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1966
  5. State v. BrandonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Belford Trucking Co. v. ZagarDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  2. Lawson v. Commonwealth Land Title InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  3. Montgomery v. Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Brand Iron, Inc. v. Koehring Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1984
  5. Callahan v. Norton (In Re Norton)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API