Legal Opinion
Russo v. Glasser
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided August 5, 2003No. CIV.3:03CV370 (PCD)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS [Doc. No. 17]
DORSEY, Senior District Judge.
On June 30, 2003, this Court granted Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 17] absent opposition. Soon thereafter, the Court received Plaintiffs Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 19], which was filed on June 30, 2003, dated June 20, 2003, and included a certification that it was mailed on June 27, 2003. Previously, this Court had granted at extension of time “nunc pro tunc,” requiring that Plaintiff file his response on or before June 20, 2003. Notwithstanding Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Liu v. MinchellaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2023
- Owusu-Boateng v. US Citizenship and Immigration ServicesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2025
- Robinson v. PilgramDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Salis v. DopicoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2024
- Vanguard Dealer Services, LLC v. Bottom Line Driven, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.