Legal Opinion

The People v. Palmer

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1932No. 21439. Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

The plaintiff in error was indicted in the circuit court of Adams county for stealing a hog, alleged to be of the value of $40. Upon a trial by a jury he was found guilty, was sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary, and has sued out a writ of error.

Plaintiff in error contends that the verdict was contrary to the evidence and that the ■ court erred in giving an instruction. In support of his contention that the verdict was contrary to the evidence it is contended that the ownership of the hog was not proved as alleged and that its value was not shown to be as much as $15.

The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. LehmannIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Springfield Consolidated Railway Co. v. HoeffnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Lycoming Fire Insurance v. JacksonIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  4. McKee v. TrislerIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Harris v. NationsTexas Supreme Court · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Middlebrook v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. The PEOPLE v. HayesIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  4. The People v. HerringIllinois Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API